![]() ![]() |
|||||
|
THE ARMY HAS A SEXUAL harassment
problem. It
has been rocked by four harassment scandals since November, the latest surfacing recently at
a base in Germany. A harassment hotline set up by the Army at the end of
last year has received 7,000 calls.
But the Army is no different than the rest of America, and it is
enduring the same harassment phenomenon as any workplace. After all,
soldiers are just us in uniform. The Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission and state agencies, for example, received about 50,000 sexual
discrimination complaints relating to civilian workplaces in 1995,
including 15,500 harassment complaints.
Curiously, harassment in the Army is not new. A Pentagon source says
that some of the cases reported to the Army hotline date back to World War
II. "Sexual harassment was not invented at Aberdeen," admits a female Army
officer, referring to the first major scandal, which broke at a
Maryland base in November.
The most important factor, perhaps, has been the female soldiers who
have started to go public with allegations. Following Aberdeen, a few weeks
ago a former aide to the Army's top enlisted man, Sergeant Major of the
Army Gene McKinney (photo), went public with accusations that he had harassed her,
setting off an avalanche of news
reports.
The pattern is familiar to Nancy Duff Campbell, co-president of the
National Women's Law Center. The Army isn't seeing anything much different
than what police forces, fire departments and other traditionally
male-dominated workplaces experienced during integration. The first wave of
women must endure hostile reactions, and they are small in number and easy
to stereotype as inferior.
In fact, Campbell notes, these factors can be present in just about any
workplace during integration. They were there when Yale University , for
example, went co-ed.
What will bring an end to Army harassment? Possibly the same factors
that cause it to diminish anywhere. Campbell lists the following:
The Army has sometimes been at the leading edge of cultural change: it racially integrated in 1948, years before the civil rights movement. Maybe it's behind in the move toward gender equality, maybe not. One thing is for sure: it is only a mirror image of the culture it's pledged to protect. --Mac McKean, Feb. 14, 1997 |
|||||